Delve into the intricate layers of the Hunter Biden tax case, and it becomes apparent that both Delaware US Attorney David Weiss and Attorney General Merrick Garland share responsibility for allowing this gravely serious matter to slip away without consequence. Weiss strategically chose to make his admission on the Friday preceding a long holiday weekend, revealing three crucial facts: firstly, he lacked the authority to charge Hunter for most of his alleged offenses; secondly, the US attorneys appointed by Joe Biden in DC and Southern California, who did possess such power, refused to act; and thirdly, Weiss needed Garland to bestow upon him the role of a special prosecutor in order to proceed. Curiously, he failed to mention whether he had specifically requested this position. Meanwhile, Garland has adeptly sidestepped the issue, dismissing inquiries regarding this blatant miscarriage of justice as unpatriotic assaults on the integrity of the Justice Department. So, did Weiss actually inquire about it? Whistleblowers claim that he had made such a request and was rejected. If true, was it Garland himself or one of his subordinates who delivered the refusal? Was Garland even aware that certain US attorneys had declined to indict Hunter? Weiss insisted that he required Attorney General Merrick Garland’s intervention to charge Hunter Biden. Is it possible that Garland deliberately turned a blind eye? What we do know is that no charges were ever filed in DC before the statute of limitations expired, shielding Hunter from prosecution for his failure to pay taxes on the funds he received from Burisma. Whistleblower testimony has revealed that Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf impeded any investigations that could implicate Joe Biden and interfered with efforts to gather additional evidence against Hunter during the Trump era. Was Weiss aware of this obstruction? Furthermore, what is his explanation for the failure of his office to pursue evidence provided by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter? Garland’s impassioned response to criticism regarding the Justice Department’s inconsistent treatment of cases implies that he is only comparing the Hunter Biden case to investigations involving other prominent Democrats and their families. However, relying on the defense that “You should be accustomed to this stench by now” hardly exonerates him.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
