Campaigners are overlooking other values as they excessively concentrate on the economic risks of Brexit

At the University of Cambridge, a group of academics have expressed their support for remaining in the European Union. While their primary concern is funding, it is important to note that alternative sources of funding, such as government support, can make up for any potential loss in research funding that might occur if Brexit were to happen. It is unfortunate to see these academics focusing solely on utilitarian aspects, as there are other values, such as freedom, democracy, accountability, and legitimacy of government, that should be considered.

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that non-EU countries like Israel, Norway, and Switzerland have participated in EU research projects due to the high quality of their research. The Eureka scheme, which promotes industrial innovation, includes countries like South Korea and Canada. This demonstrates that there are opportunities for collaboration and research outside of the EU.

If the UK were to leave the EU, it is possible that British pensioners living in Europe could face frozen pensions without adjustments for inflation. Currently, half a million pensioners in Commonwealth countries already experience this inequality. Without guarantees in place, British pensioners in the EU could potentially face the same fate. This could lead to a generation of pensioners forced to return to the UK due to the difficulties of negotiating agreements with 27 EU countries, resulting in hardship and poverty.

Many individuals view remaining in the EU as the safer choice, indicating that the Leave campaign has not effectively conveyed that there is no status quo. For the euro to survive, eurozone countries must move towards fiscal and political union. This could potentially involve budgetary restrictions and tax-raising measures that could have negative implications for Britain in the future.

In the EU debate, economists and financial organizations emphasize the economic risks of leaving, while the Leave side focuses on the future impact of migration. However, this dichotomy oversimplifies the issue, as there are numerous factors that can either exacerbate or mitigate the consequences of leaving or remaining in the EU. It is crucial that this debate does not devolve into partisan division, but rather fosters constructive dialogue.

As the referendum approaches, there is a concern regarding how the result will be determined in the event of a tie. It remains unclear what majority and recount procedures would be required to reach a final decision that both sides would respect.

Threat to Green Fields

Reference

Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment