The US Supreme Court has witnessed a crucial gun-related case, as it heard arguments in one of the most significant gun cases to come before it in decades.Three elements of the case determine its importance: the question of whether individuals under domestic abuse retraining orders should be barred from owning firearms, Zackey Rahimi’s circumstances, and the implications of a conservative majority in the Supreme Court on gun rights. Under a 1994 federal law, people with such restrictions cannot own firearms. However, a Supreme Court ruling has called into question numerous federal gun regulations. The Mississippi Supreme Court complained that judges are “not trained as historians,” and a recent ruling prompted a crucial decision this year. The case presents a litmus test for the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on the limitations of gun rights. The US administration has underscored the dangers that women in abusive relationships face when firearms are present. The case marked a critical juncture, with supporters and protestors expressing varied opinions, all centering around the pivotal Supreme Court decision.
US Supreme Court to Decide on Domestic Abusers’ Gun Rights in United States v Rahimi
