Unveiling the Harsh Reality: Lessons Learned from Kevin McCarthy’s Ousting

Receive free The FT View updates

We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest The FT View news every morning.

Kevin McCarthy’s political career was marked by an attempt to appease the extreme elements of the Republican party, a move that ultimately led to his downfall. McCarthy, who served as Speaker of the House of Representatives, faced opposition from within his own party and lasted only 269 days in office. This swift demise serves as a cautionary tale for any Republican seeking to work with MAGA extremists, led by Donald Trump. It is clear that compromise is futile and can be detrimental to those interested in effective governance.

In his pursuit of power, McCarthy made a significant concession to the extremists by allowing a single member of the House to trigger a motion that could result in his removal. This decision proved to be his downfall when he agreed to a funding deal with the Democrats to prevent a government shutdown. The lesson is clear: any Republican candidate should avoid making similar agreements with MAGA ultras like Congressman Matt Gaetz. They are uncompromising and should be marginalized instead of appeased.

Considering the narrow majority that Republicans hold in the House of Representatives, any responsible candidate to succeed McCarthy would need to garner support from Democrats. This responsibility also falls on the Democratic party, who must determine their willingness to compromise for the sake of a functional US government. The stakes are high, as the operation of the federal government and Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion are at risk without a stable budget in place. The House of Representatives requires a capable speaker to navigate these challenges.

The chaos in Congress reflects a broader disintegration of the American political system. Despite facing multiple criminal cases and potential losses in a civil fraud case, Donald Trump remains a front-runner for the Republican party nomination. With Trump in the spotlight, the upcoming presidential election promises to be chaotic. A leaderless Congress incapable of passing a budget would exacerbate the decline of the US political system.

What compromises could the Democrats reasonably make in the search for a new speaker? At present, two candidates are favored: Jim Jordan, who aligns closely with radicals, and Steve Scalise, who has taken a more responsible stance on Ukraine but still supports the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump. This position alone is likely to hinder Democratic support for Scalise. If both Scalise and Jordan are rejected, it opens the possibility for less radical Republicans to step forward. The best solution would involve a centrist Republican who is willing to confront the MAGA extremists, and the Democrats should seize the opportunity if such a candidate emerges. The American political system teeters on the brink of self-destruction, and even members of Congress will face the consequences if it falls into the abyss.