In a bold departure from conventional wisdom, Mr. Ellwood showcases significant infrastructure improvements in Afghanistan since the Taliban took over in a video dated July. He opens with the surprising statement, “All that’s happened here since 9/11 – this is a very different country indeed. It feels different now that the Taliban have returned to power.”
Mr. Ellwood then proceeds to highlight some positive changes: improved security, reduced corruption, and the decline of the opium trade. Moreover, he points out the proliferation of pylons distributing electricity, the widespread presence of solar panels powering irrigation pumps, and the resulting increase in crop production.
However, the video’s central question looms large: “After Nato’s dramatic departure, should the West now engage with the Taliban?” It’s a thought-provoking query that demands careful consideration.
Interestingly, the Taliban spokesman retweeted the video, acknowledging the validity of the positive developments mentioned. This unexpected endorsement adds a layer of complexity to the situation.
Nevertheless, during a subsequent session in the House of Commons, Mark Francois, a member of the defense select committee, harshly criticized Mr. Ellwood’s video as “utterly bizarre.” Mr. Francois pointed out the omission of crucial information, such as the Taliban’s continued persecution of Afghan citizens who aided Western forces and the denial of education to young girls in Afghanistan.
It is essential to note that Mr. Ellwood clarified that he was speaking for himself and admitted his mistake the following day, apologizing for his misguided comments.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
