More than 40 years ago, field ecologists embarked on a mission to quantify tree diversity on Barro Colorado Island in Panama. They meticulously counted trees with trunks wider than a centimeter, identified species, measured trunks, and calculated individual biomass. They even climbed ladders, examined saplings, and recorded all data in spreadsheets. Over time, they noticed a peculiar pattern: although the island had a staggering 300 species of trees, the majority of trees belonged to only a few species. This phenomenon of uneven distribution has been observed in ecosystems worldwide, particularly in rainforests. Traditional ecological theory, which states that every niche should be occupied by one species, fails to explain this high biodiversity.
However, a new ecological modeling paper published in Nature by James O’Dwyer and Kenneth Jops sheds light on this discrepancy. The researchers found that species that would typically compete head-to-head can coexist in an ecosystem if their life histories align in specific ways. This work also explains why simplified ecological models can still produce accurate results despite ignoring important details about organisms.
The initial study on Barro Colorado Island inspired Stephen Hubbell to propose the neutral theory of ecology in 2001. This theory challenged the idea that species competition drives biodiversity, suggesting instead that random processes play a significant role. Although the theory neglected species differences, neutral models reproduced real-world data, sparking interest in understanding their success.
O’Dwyer recognized the universalities among living organisms and wondered if certain aspects of how organisms live are more crucial than others in determining their ability to compete and survive. For instance, the concept of life history, which takes into account factors like average offspring number, time until sexual maturity, and life span, holds promise. By incorporating life history and competition into their model, Jops and O’Dwyer discovered that species with similar life histories could coexist despite competing for resources.
Further analysis revealed that a measurement called effective population size played a crucial role in determining species complementarity. Species with similar patterns of mortality at different life stages were more likely to coexist successfully. The researchers tested their findings using real-world data from the COMPADRE database and found that species living in the same ecosystem had closely matching life histories.
These findings challenge the notion that species must occupy distinct niches to coexist. Instead, species with complementary characteristics can thrive alongside each other. This research has broad implications for understanding the complexities of biodiversity and species interactions in ecosystems.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
