To the Editor:
In the article “Trump, in Shadow of Capitol, Issues a Not Guilty Plea,” the plea of not guilty by Donald Trump to charges of fraud and obstruction is discussed. This plea comes in the wake of the violence, death, and chaos that occurred on January 6. Unfortunately, it seems that Trump lacks an understanding of guilt, responsibility, and the need for self-reflection regarding his actions on that infamous day. Instead, he relies on lies, blaming others, and outrage.
These qualities are not fitting for any president, let alone the leader of a complex nation facing economic, diplomatic, and social problems that demand attention. It is my hope that we never see another presidential candidate with such character deficiencies, and that citizens become more discerning in their choices.
Amy Knitzer
Montclair, N.J.
To the Editor:
In the article “The Trial America Needs,” David French discusses the need to prove that Donald Trump knowingly lied about winning the election. It is perplexing to think that refusing to acknowledge the truth can serve as a valid defense for his actions. In my legal studies, I learned about the “reasonable person” standard used to determine liability in various circumstances. If a reasonable president would have known that he lost the election based on overwhelming evidence, shouldn’t we hold this former president accountable with that knowledge, regardless of whether he believed it or not? It is unreasonable to reject facts, and Trump should not be allowed to evade the consequences of his actions through obtuseness.
Rhonda Starer
Harrington Park, N.J.
To the Editor:
In the editorial “A President Accused of Betraying His Country,” the 2016 presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is brought up. During the debate, Trump was asked if he would accept the election result if he lost, and he refused to give a definitive answer. He instead replied, “I will look at it at the time” and “I will keep you in suspense.” The fact that this question needed to be asked should have been shocking, and Trump’s clear contempt for democracy should have been disqualifying for many voters. Looking back, it is clear that Trump warned us about what we are currently facing. It is a reminder of the dangers of ignoring red flags.
David Sabritt
Seattle
To the Editor:
The article “First Amendment Is Likely Linchpin of Trump Defense” discusses the legal strategy of Trump’s defense team. While it may make sense legally, the argument that “I have a constitutional right to lie all I want” does not sound like a winning one for reelection. As a voter, I am not convinced.
Anna Cypra Oliver
Great Barrington, Mass.
To the Editor:
In the article “Trump Far Ahead in the G.O.P. Race Despite Charges,” it is clear that Donald Trump will lose the general election if he becomes the Republican nominee. The significant portion of anti-Trump GOP voters will do what they did in 2020 and vote for the Democratic nominee. These swing voters were crucial in the last election, and their numbers are increasing with each new indictment against Trump. It doesn’t matter how loyal Trump’s supporters are; if they want a Republican president, they need to choose someone other than Trump. Other GOP candidates may hesitate to criticize Trump to avoid alienating his base, but this sycophancy won’t sway his followers. A more effective and pragmatic approach would be to emphasize that moderate Republicans or swing voters will hand the election to the Democrats if Trump is the nominee.
Jana Happel
New York
To the Editor:
In the opinion piece “Why We Need More Public Pools,” Mara Gay highlights the racial disparities and public health crisis surrounding drowning rates among Black and brown communities. This disparity is unacceptable and should be recognized as a safety and public health priority. The discriminatory policies that limit access to swimming opportunities contribute to the disparities in swimming ability and water safety. It is also important to promote more inclusive access to competitive swimming to provide role models. The recent policy change by the International Swimming Federation (FINA) in allowing the use of the Soul Cap for Black hair shows that public campaigns can lead to change. A national public health campaign should be launched to ensure water safety and swimming training are widely available, and that the health benefits of swimming are understood and enjoyed by all.
Adrienne Wald
High Falls, N.Y.
To the Editor:
As a person who cannot afford the luxury of not multitasking, I found Oliver Burkeman’s essay on the subject to be written from a place of privilege. Burkeman, a white, well-off man, can afford to advise against multitasking, but for many others, this is not an option. It is a privilege that very few can afford.
Melissa Morgenlander
Brooklyn
To the Editor:
After reading Oliver Burkeman’s essay on multitasking, I closed the newspaper and placed it aside, feeling empowered. However, I have yet to find the time to finish reading the rest of the article.
Pablo Monsivais
Spokane, Wash.
To the Editor:
In the opinion piece “The Stressed-Out Life of a Biter in Chief,” Alexandra Horowitz discusses dog behavior and biting. As someone who fears dogs due to past negative experiences, I appreciate learning more about the reasons why dogs bite. It is helpful to understand the complexities behind these actions, even if it doesn’t completely eliminate my fear.
Lisa M. Feldstein
New York
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
