The detrimental impact of social media on teenagers’ mental health has been a topic of concern in recent years. However, there is limited research that definitively proves the harm caused by social media or identifies the specific sites, apps, or features that are problematic. Additionally, there is no widely accepted definition of social media, leaving parents, policymakers, and other adults without clear guidance on what to be concerned about.
Dr. Vivek Murthy, the U.S. surgeon general, emphasized the potential risks of social media but did not mention any specific platforms. He acknowledged the lack of a standardized scholarly definition of social media. Most studies examine platforms with user-generated content and interactions, but this raises questions about whether it matters if teenagers see posts from familiar or unfamiliar individuals, whether posting or passive viewing makes a difference, and whether activities like multiplayer games and dating apps should be considered social media.
YouTube poses a unique challenge in defining social media. While it is the most popular site among teenagers, little research has been conducted on its effects. Some researchers speculate that YouTube may have less detrimental effects, as teenagers typically consume content passively rather than actively engaging through posting and commenting. However, others argue that YouTube carries similar risks due to features like endless scrolling and algorithmic recommendations.
Despite the concern surrounding social media, the existing research on its effects on adolescents’ mental health is weak and inconsistent. There is a lack of evidence to determine which sites, apps, or features have specific impacts on mental health. It is challenging to establish whether social media directly causes poor mental health or if there is a correlation. Many studies measure the time spent on social media and mental health symptoms but fail to consider other factors like time spent away from activities like exercise and sleep.
Some studies have attempted novel approaches to address these issues. For example, a study conducted during Facebook’s early days found a negative effect on students’ mental health when the platform was introduced to college campuses. Another study called Project Awesome examines the average effects of social media on 1,000 surveyed teenagers and explores individual differences and changes over time. This project suggests that the time spent on social media is less consequential than the teenagers’ moods while using it. Brain scans have also shown that adolescents’ sensitivity to social rewards and punishments is activated when engaging with social media features like likes and frequently checking feeds.
The research findings on social media and mental health mostly indicate a small, negative correlation. However, the underlying factors causing this correlation are unclear. It is uncertain whether social media is the cause of worsening mental health, if those with poor mental health are more likely to use social media, or if other factors like socioeconomic status contribute to the link.
Overall, social media’s effects on mental health are highly individualized and depend on what individuals are exposed to. Unlike TV or movies, it is impossible to predict what children will encounter on social media. While it can expose them to harmful content, it can also provide mental health resources and enhance social connections. Vulnerable teenagers, such as those with low self-esteem or social struggles, are more susceptible to negative effects. Exposure to manipulated images and using social media for comparisons and seeking approval has been associated with worsened body image and depressive symptoms.
The lack of solid research can be attributed to the time-consuming nature of academic research and the difficulties in recruiting minors as participants. By the time a study is completed, teenagers may have moved on to different platforms. Tech companies have also not provided enough data to help researchers understand the impacts of their products.
Future studies should examine specific types of social media content, long-term effects of social media use in adolescence, neural pathways, and strategies to protect youth from negative effects. Innovative experiments, such as randomly assigning entire middle schools to abstain from social media, have been proposed to gain more conclusive evidence.
In the meantime, experts agree that waiting for further research is not a viable option. Some level of social media use can be beneficial, as it is where social interaction takes place. However, social media rules should be tailored to each teenager’s maturity level and challenges. Addressing the risks should be a collaborative effort involving tech companies, policymakers, and parents. Steps parents can take include setting limits on social media use, especially before bedtime, initially providing young teenagers with devices without internet access, engaging in conversations with teenagers about their online experiences, and modeling responsible internet use.
Monitoring specific apps is not as important as actively engaging with children and discussing topics like good digital citizenship, respect for oneself and others, and daily experiences.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
