Is Electroshock Therapy in Need of a Ban? Activists Argue Against, While Psychiatrists Highlight Its Benefits. Should More Patients Embrace the Controversial Treatment to Overcome Depression?

One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, a 1975 film directed by Stanley Kubrick, is a highly disturbing portrayal of psychiatric treatment. The movie revolves around Randle McMurphy, played by Jack Nicholson, a criminal who feigns mental illness to avoid hard labor. Instead, he becomes the victim of cruel treatment at the hands of a vengeful nurse. One of the most unsettling scenes depicts McMurphy being subjected to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as punishment for his unruly behavior. Nurses and orderlies hold him down while electrodes are placed on his temples, causing him to convulse in agony. Based on the novel by Ken Kesey, who had experience working in a psychiatric hospital, the film was praised for shedding light on the grim realities faced by mental health patients in the 20th century.

Mental health experts, in a recent discussion with The Mail on Sunday, highlighted the enduring impact that the film has had on public perceptions of ECT, a treatment that is still used today. ECT advocates argue that it “resets” the brain and can be effective in treating severe depression when other options have failed. In the UK alone, ECT is administered approximately 20,000 times a year. Some psychiatrists even believe that ECT is underutilized and should be offered more frequently.

However, critics, including psychologists and former patients, are calling for a suspension of what they deem to be a “torturous” and “barbaric” treatment until further research is conducted. Professor John Read and his colleagues published an article in the journal Psychology And Psychotherapy, accusing doctors of failing to fully inform patients about the risks associated with ECT. Their audit of ECT clinics in the UK revealed that important information, such as the potential impact on heart health and the lack of evidence for long-term benefits, was missing from the majority of patient leaflets. Professor Read claims that patients are consenting to a procedure without being fully aware of the potential harm it can cause.

So, what is the reality of ECT? Developed in the 1930s, ECT involves passing an electric current through the brain via electrodes placed on the sides of the head. Before 1950, ECT was performed without a general anesthetic, requiring nurses to restrain patients. The voltage used was also higher than what is currently applied, as advancements in technology now allow doctors to tailor the electric current to each patient’s brain waves. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends ECT for severe depression and mania when other treatments have proven ineffective. While the majority of patients consent to ECT, it can also be administered without consent for individuals detained under the Mental Health Act.

Studies indicate that approximately 80% of patients experience an improvement in symptoms a month after a course of ECT, although the exact mechanism of action remains uncertain. While memory loss can be a side effect, brain imaging studies have not shown any physical damage. ECT does carry an increased risk of heart damage in patients with underlying cardiac conditions. Critics argue that while the information provided to patients could be better, it is often difficult to fully brief individuals who are severely unwell and may struggle to understand or pay attention. Proponents of ECT stress its life-saving potential, particularly for patients at high risk of suicide.

In conclusion, One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest has had a lasting impact on public perceptions of ECT. While the film is not an entirely accurate depiction of the treatment, it continues to shape opinions and deter both patients and doctors from considering ECT. Advocates argue that ECT remains a valuable and effective option for treating severe mental health conditions, while critics emphasize the need for more research and improved patient education about the potential risks involved.

Reference

Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment