Evolution of the Threat Posed by Trump’s Supporters

Their words are passionate, but their coordination is lacking.

Picture of blurry Donald Trump standing at a lectern in the foreground, his audience in high-definition in the background
Dustin Chambers / Reuters

The arraignment of Donald Trump at a federal courthouse in Miami today signifies a new phase in his long history of incitement campaigns. Since being charged with unlawfully retaining and storing classified documents at his Florida resort, Trump and his allies have launched attacks on the prosecutor, his wife, the Justice Department, President Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton, among others. Their rhetoric is filled with belligerent language, causing concerns among terrorism experts and security planners that Trump’s supporters could once again resort to violence, as they did during the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol.

However, while the threat of violence persists, it has taken on a different form. Large-scale organized violence like the January 6 riot seems less likely now. The pressing question is what actions dangerous individuals may take individually, and whether authorities are prepared to intervene.

Incitement to violence is not a simple on/off switch, and the mere use of strong words does not necessarily lead to violence. It would be ideal for political leaders of all persuasions to avoid using aggressive language, as they should be aware of its potential consequences. However, the metric to watch is not whether the base is emboldened, but rather whether the number of supporters inclined towards violence is growing.

While their words may be heated, it appears that coordination among Trump’s supporters is lacking. Law enforcement monitoring of websites and potential planning in Florida has not uncovered any specific or credible threats. The atmosphere is undoubtedly intense, but Trump no longer holds the same resources he once did. He no longer has control over any military or law enforcement agency to call upon for support. Unlike on January 6, when Trump refused to mobilize the government against the riots, his reluctance to intervene will not deter others from taking action. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is competing against Trump for the 2024 Republican presidential candidacy, may be hesitant to openly challenge his rival but is unlikely to conspire to assist Trump if violence were to erupt during the court proceedings in the coming weeks.

The events of January 6 occurred at a specific time and place – the Capitol – when Trump’s loss was being certified. It was a unique event that motivated his supporters to disrupt the process. Although the former president’s arraignment is a highly publicized occasion, and his supporters have organized some public protests, criminal cases tend to progress slowly. As of yesterday afternoon, there were doubts about whether Trump would even have local counsel to represent him. The slow pace of the justice system reduces the incentive to disrupt proceedings on any given day. No single moment is decisive, especially in this early stage.

Another difference from January 6 is that Trump’s supporters now understand that participating in such events has legal consequences. Trump has made promises to pardon the rioters if he were to become president again, but so far those promises have meant very little. Hundreds of his supporters have been indicted, and many have been imprisoned. Various defendants from January 6 have expressed their belief that the government, specifically Trump, approved of their actions. Some of them have expressed outrage, disappointment, and a sense of betrayal. A violent movement cannot succeed without its soldiers.

Even if the level of discontent among Trump’s supporters has not changed, people generally need leadership and organization for coordinated violence to occur. Trump may be unruly and angry, but he also appears isolated. Major groups that helped organize the January 6 incident, such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, have significantly diminished in power. Their leaders are in jail, and they have turned against each other.

People may talk tough, but without organization and focused commitment, it is unlikely

Reference

Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment