The Issue: The Senate Passes Bipartisan Resolution to Restore Formal Dress Code
Last week, Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer relaxed the dress code for senators, but not for staffers and others on the floor. However, thanks to Sen. Joe Manchin, the Senate has now reversed Schumer’s decision. We applaud Manchin while still expressing our disapproval of Schumer’s actions.
Jim Grant, Jensen Beach, Fla.
In a rare bipartisan effort, the US Senate has decided to reverse course on the Fetterman-coddling dress code approved by Sen. Schumer. However, we believe that they should also require senators to wear suits on the floor and physically be present to cast their votes. Allowing members to shout their votes from the cloakroom doorway is a farce that undermines the Senate’s dignity.
Bo Madden, Jupiter, Fla.
Finally, some good news from Washington! Schumer’s decision to relax the dress code was disrespectful and unnecessary. It was clear that he did it for Sen. Fetterman, who regularly dresses in casual attire. However, it backfired as many senators preferred to dress professionally. This is a victory for those who value decorum. We challenge Sen. Fetterman to join his colleagues and dress appropriately for the next meeting.
Rob Johann, Woodhaven
The reign of the “Fetterman Rule” was short-lived but remarkable. It briefly united people against the questionable dress standards of our out-of-shape political system. Fetterman’s attempt to push for a more casual future was met with resistance, while traditional politicians celebrated.
Oliver Mosier, Brooklyn
The Issue: Second Round of Republican Presidential Primary Debates
The GOP debate resembled a circus, with the clowns already present. Instead of constructive discussion, candidates resorted to yelling, talking over each other, and insults. The moderators struggled to maintain order, akin to a rowdy class with a substitute teacher. Despite the chaos, most candidates, excluding Chris Christie, would be a preferable alternative to the current president. It’s time for changes to the debate format, whether by modifying the rules or eliminating them altogether.
Robert DiNardo, Farmingdale
We need better control of the debates to prevent participants from talking out of turn. I propose a solution: participants should be placed in soundproof glass booths on stage. Moderators would ask questions, allowing each individual three minutes to respond. Once the time is up, their microphone would be immediately cut off. If soundproof booths are not feasible, shock collars could be used to discourage speaking out of turn, which would surely increase viewership.
Wayne L. Johnson, Alexandria, Va.
Interested in sharing your thoughts? Contact us at [email protected] (please include your full name and city of residence). Note that letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
