Editorial: Immersion in Beauty is Now Legal at Dartmoor – The Guardian’s Perspective on Wild Camping


It

rained again. Across Britain, the skies displayed various shades of gray, as they have for weeks. However, regardless of the weather, the final day of July should be celebrated as a remarkable day for outdoor enthusiasts.

In the evening sunshine at the Oval, the Ashes series delivered a surprisingly poetic conclusion as Stuart Broad secured an extraordinary victory for England with the last ball of his illustrious career. Meanwhile, over 200 miles away in Devon, Haytor Rocks hosted its own celebrations after a significant legal triumph, offering new possibilities for appreciating and preserving our national parks.

Eventually, supporters of the right to roam may want to extend their gratitude to Alexander Darwall, the hedge fund manager and landowner whose attempt to ban backpack campers from Dartmoor’s breathtaking landscapes failed. Darwall’s court case not only shed light on the issue of accessing nature and the privatization of public land but also resulted in the overturning of the initial verdict, which was heard by only a handful of people in January. In contrast, a right to roam demonstration on Dartmoor drew the attention of 3,500 individuals in the months leading up to Monday’s overturned decision on appeal.

The court of appeal’s verdict confirmed that camping overnight falls under the right to “open-air recreation” as defined in the 1985 Dartmoor Commons Act. Absurd arguments suggesting that camping is not a recreational activity because it only involves sleeping in a tent were rightly dismissed. Darwall had attempted to commercialize Dartmoor by offering pheasant shoots, deerstalking, and holiday rentals on his 4,000-acre property. This ruling safeguards the rights of backpackers who desire to experience its beauty as a soul-soothing remedy, awakening to its magnificent sunrises and leaving no trace behind.

In a country where just 8% of land can be accessed for picnicking and walking without permission, this judicial decision should ignite a broader dialogue on access to England’s green spaces, woodlands, cliffs, and rivers. Dartmoor remains the lone national park where wild camping is permitted, but there is no valid reason why it should not be piloted in other parks, as suggested by the British Mountaineering Council and other organizations.

The Labour Party has committed to introducing a more inclusive right-to-roam law, similar to that in Scotland, where the countryside is open access and behavior is regulated by an etiquette code. Recent data reveals that there is no right to roam in 92 constituencies across England. It is imperative to challenge the assumptions that have made “No trespassers” signs such a common sight in the English landscape.

In 1947, a parliamentary report advocated for the public’s right to “explore the wild and isolated places, and the solace and inspiration they provide for those who have spent too long in the city.” Although this week’s legal judgment on Dartmoor was expressed in more technical terms, it was informed by a similar spirit. For the Dartmoor National Park Authority, which appealed against the initial verdict, this ruling serves as a vindication. These generous principles must now be applied more broadly.

Reference

Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment