Dan Crenshaw strongly criticizes Democratic colleagues supporting child sex change surgery, asserting sanity on the issue

In a passionate speech during a House health hearing, Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas called out his Democratic colleagues for their support of sex change surgery for children. He condemned the procedures, such as double mastectomies on 12-year-old girls and castrations on ten-year-old boys, as cruel. He also criticized the use of permanent hormone therapy and puberty blockers, which can have long-lasting effects on a child’s physiology and fertility.

Crenshaw challenged the notion that the debate over sex change surgery is a manufactured culture war, pointing to the overwhelming opposition to these procedures among Americans. He highlighted a staggering 45,000% increase in transition surgeries at hospitals that conduct them, debunking the notion that Republicans are simply making up these concerns. He attributed this surge to the influence of peers on vulnerable children.

The congressman raised the question of why anyone would support such high-risk procedures on children without clear benefits for their future biology and mental health. Drawing an analogy, he emphasized that while you may not know that bananas are healthy for kids, there is little risk in giving them one. However, the decision to undergo sex change surgeries carries significant consequences, making it a critical issue.

Crenshaw took aimed at Democrats for ignoring the majority of Americans who do not support these procedures, especially considering that taxpayer money is involved. He argued that roughly 70% of U.S. teens seeking gender clinics have pre-existing psychiatric diagnoses, raising doubts about claims that denying this type of care leads to increased suicide rates. The congressman emphasized the importance of considering these preconditions before proposing permanent physiological changes.

The congressman asserted that pressing pause on these procedures is a reasonable approach given the lack of scientific evidence supporting their benefits. He challenged his colleagues to provide counterarguments based on scientific data. He reiterated that Republicans are not the ones lacking compassion or being cruel, but rather encouraging a cautious approach until more conclusive evidence emerges.

It’s worth noting that the article was written by Brandon Gillespie, an associate editor at Fox News. For more information, readers can refer to the author’s bio at the end of the article.

Reference

Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment