This EPA regulation aims to restrict your car purchasing options

NEWIntroducing the new feature from Fox News – you can now listen to articles!

The Environmental Protection Agency has recently announced a new rule that will have a significant impact on the automobile industry. This rule calls for a drastic reduction in tailpipe emissions for light- and medium-duty vehicles.

The Biden administration refers to these new pollution standards as the most ambitious ever for cars and trucks. They claim that it will greatly reduce climate and other harmful air pollution. They even project that electric vehicles could make up 67% of new light-duty vehicle sales and 46% of new medium-duty sales by 2032.

However, these goals seem quite ambitious considering that electric vehicles currently make up only 5.8% of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. In fact, less than 1% of all registered vehicles were electric in 2021. It seems that the existing subsidies are not enough to convince the majority of Americans to switch to electric vehicles.

Environmental Protection Agency

The Environmental Protection Agency’s logo on a door at its headquarters on March 16, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

This administration is aggressively pushing forward with its climate agenda and seems determined to completely transform the automotive industry, regardless of consumer preferences. The ultimate goal is to phase out gas-powered vehicles.

BIDEN UNVEILS TOUGHEST-EVER CAR EMISSIONS RULES IN BID TO FORCE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PURCHASES

Our elected officials justify these stricter regulations by citing environmental concerns and air pollution. However, since the Clean Air Act was enacted in 1970, air quality has significantly improved. Thanks to technological advancements, emissions and pollutants have decreased by a remarkable 77%. We have come a long way from the hazardous conditions that led to the creation of the act fifty years ago.

“Transitioning to clean energy” may not be as straightforward as it seems. The production of an electric vehicle actually emits more greenhouse gases than combustion engines. This is due to the raw materials required for lithium batteries, which are the most energy-intensive aspect of EV production. Additionally, we rely on China for the supply of these materials. Furthermore, the increased weight of electric vehicles puts more strain on roads and requires additional maintenance.

Price is another significant factor. On average, electric vehicles cost $18,000 more than gas-powered vehicles. Considering the median income in the U.S. is only $44,225, EVs are out of reach for most people. A $64,000 car is simply not feasible for the average household.

There are also other costs to consider when owning an electric vehicle. Insurance costs are higher due to expensive parts and batteries that may need replacement. Specialized services are required for repairs and maintenance. Home charging stations need to be installed for convenient charging. Furthermore, electric vehicles tend to wear out tires faster.

Given all these factors, it is no surprise that most Americans are hesitant to embrace electric vehicles. Apart from the high price tag, issues with range, long charging times, costlier maintenance, and limited capacity in colder climates make EVs impractical for the average consumer.

SCHOOLS ARE SCARING OUR KIDS TO DEATH WITH THIS INDOCTRINATION PROGRAM

These aggressive regulations from the EPA will disproportionately affect the Black community. With a lower median income compared to Whites, Black households are less likely to own a vehicle. Studies have shown that car ownership can help lift people out of poverty and reduce wage disparities. Mandating an all-electric fleet will only widen the income inequality gap and make it even more difficult for minorities to afford electric vehicles. Additionally, low home ownership rates among Blacks make it challenging to have access to home charging infrastructure.

The majority of Americans living paycheck to paycheck have more pressing concerns such as basic necessities and bills. Retrofitting their homes and cars for climate change is not a top priority, especially with the high costs involved.

Furthermore, fully transitioning to electric vehicles poses other challenges. It would require a substantial increase in electricity production, which is problematic considering the unreliability of the current power grid. The power grid relies on fossil fuels for at least 60% of its electricity, rendering the move away from them futile. In addition, integrating more renewable energy sources into the grid would require costly upgrades and put more strain on the system.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Ultimately, it remains unclear whether widespread adoption of electric vehicles will have a significant impact on carbon emissions and climate change. Some studies suggest that the contribution to global temperature reduction is minuscule.

In conclusion, we should not let climate alarmism be the driving force behind a complete overhaul of the American economy or give excessive control to a federal bureaucracy. Legislators need to reconsider this rule as it is detrimental to consumers.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Reference

Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment