During a routine visit, the patient’s doctor asks if she plans to continue with mammograms for breast cancer screening and reminds her that it’s been almost 10 years since her last colonoscopy. Given the patient’s age of 76, there may be a case against further mammogram appointments. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening mammograms for women aged 40 to 74, but the evidence for women age 75 and older is insufficient. Screening for colorectal cancer also becomes questionable for advanced ages. Although it is given a C grade for those aged 76 to 85, meaning the net benefit is small, it should only be offered selectively.
However, it is important to consider other factors about this hypothetical woman. Does she engage in regular physical activity? Does she have any underlying health conditions? Did her parents live for a long time? Does she smoke? These factors influence her life expectancy, which in turn affects the usefulness, futility, or potential harm of future cancer screenings. Similar considerations apply to various health decisions in older age, such as drug regimens, surgeries, treatments, and screenings.
Medical associations and health advocacy groups are beginning to shift their approaches by considering life expectancy rather than solely relying on age when making recommendations about tests and treatments. By incorporating life expectancy into guidelines, better decision-making can be achieved. Some recent recommendations from the task force already reflect this broader view, taking into account factors such as smoking history and health problems that substantially limit life expectancy.
Estimating life expectancy can be challenging, but online tools can provide ballpark estimates based on certain criteria. These tools are designed to inform decision-making by providing objective information. For example, the Know Your Chances calculator, developed by experts at the Dartmouth Institute, helps predict the odds of dying from common diseases and overall mortality based on age, sex, race, and smoking status. Similarly, other institutions offer disease-specific calculators to assess risks.
One comprehensive tool for estimating life expectancy in older adults is ePrognosis, which provides validated geriatric scales to estimate mortality and disability. These scales incorporate detailed information about health history and current functional ability. By considering life expectancy, these tools can highlight which screenings and interventions may be useful.
Ultimately, life expectancy is a guide and not a limit on medical care. Patients may choose to continue screenings even when they no longer provide significant benefits, while others may not be interested in discussing their life expectancy. It is important for patients to discuss these predictions with their healthcare providers to make informed decisions.
In conclusion, online tools offer valuable context beyond age alone when making healthcare decisions. By considering projected life expectancy, individuals can focus on what’s important and avoid being influenced solely by the latest news. These tools should be used as a starting point for conversations with healthcare providers to make well-informed decisions.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
