Commenting on the rise of sugar substitutes in food and drinks marketed for children, Rebekah Miller, a stay-at-home mom from St. Petersburg, Florida, expressed concern about the blackberry-tea-flavored “drink enhancers” her daughters consume. These flavorings, although advertised as having “natural” ingredients and packed with vitamins, also contain sucralose, a sugar substitute. Miller questions whether it is appropriate to give these products to her young children, given the potential health impacts. Many parents are facing a similar dilemma as they try to reduce their children’s sugar intake but end up opting for products filled with artificial sweeteners. These snacks and drinks often claim to be “low-sugar” or have “half the sugar” of previous formulations, but fail to disclose the use of sugar alcohols or chemical sweeteners in their ingredients. While the goal of reducing sugar in kids’ diets is commendable, experts caution that parents may unknowingly be exposing their children to additives that have not been thoroughly studied in children. As concerns grow, the World Health Organization recently declared aspartame, a commonly used sweetener, as a possible carcinogen. Walter Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard, voices his concerns about the lack of control and parental consent in this “huge experiment” of substituting sugar with various sweeteners. The market is now flooded with an array of sweeteners that may confuse consumers, making it challenging to find sugar-free options for children. Food manufacturers argue that they are responding to consumer demand for sugar-free and low-sugar products. However, critics worry that the long-term effects of these sweeteners, especially on children, remain uncertain due to the limitations of scientific studies. The surge in low-sugar and no-sugar products is also influenced by government regulations aimed at reducing added sugars in food, such as strict “healthy” labeling requirements and nutrition standards for school meals. Consequently, food manufacturers are reformulating their products and turning to sugar substitutes to comply with these regulations. Some support the development and use of alternative sweeteners, highlighting the health risks associated with high-calorie diets. Michelle Obama, through her co-founded children’s drink brand PLEZi, defends the use of natural sweeteners like monk fruit and stevia, emphasizing the need to reduce overall sugar consumption among children while maintaining flavor. However, experts caution against making generalizations about the health consequences of various sweeteners since their chemical compositions and biological effects differ significantly. Plant-derived sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit are considered safer, but research on their safety and potential effects on children is limited. Furthermore, the intense sweetness of these substitutes may contribute to a craving for sweeter foods. Unlike medicines, food additives do not undergo rigorous FDA scrutiny, with companies often self-certifying the safety of new additives. Critics argue that more extensive research and regulation are necessary in this area to protect children’s health.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
