With only 472 days remaining until the 2024 presidential election, many are wondering if Joe Biden intends to remain secluded in the White House basement, avoiding any discussion about his son Hunter, foreign bribes, and Department of Justice cover-ups. While he may attempt to seek refuge behind the cloak of MSNBC anchors, the American people are demanding answers regarding a series of scandalous revelations.
One particularly alarming revelation involves the head of Ukrainian gas company, Burisma, who communicated unequivocally with a credible FBI informant about the exact duration of time Hunter Biden was on the payroll. It becomes evident that the head of Burisma required the assistance of Joe Biden’s son to resolve various issues and orchestrate the removal of a prosecutor. These facts have been thoroughly documented, leaving little room for doubt. Additionally, it is worth noting that Hunter Biden possessed no expertise in the oil and gas industry, suffered from drug addiction, and frequently used his father’s name to gain favor with clients. Therefore, it becomes imperative to question the true motive behind his substantial payments from Burisma, aside from potential influence over Joe Biden.
Disturbingly, any attempt to investigate the $17 million Hunter Biden earned from foreign clients was met with significant hindrance, as testified by two IRS whistleblowers. They were obstructed at every turn, with Hunter being alerted to potential interviews, agents being denied access to the Biden residence, and felony charges inexplicably downgraded to misdemeanors. Even an entire IRS team dedicated to the investigation was sidelined after years of tireless work. Astonishingly, the same Democrats who vocally praised whistleblowers during Donald Trump’s presidency now disparage these government employees, discrediting their testimony without presenting any substantive counterarguments.
Furthermore, Mykola Zlochevsky openly admitted feeling “pressured” to pay Hunter $5 million and Joe Biden an additional $5 million for their assistance. Former business partner Tony Bobulinski corroborated this claim, revealing that he had personally met with Joe Biden to discuss a potential deal with a China-based energy firm called CEFC. Emails further substantiate the fact that Joe Biden intended to enter into a partnership with his son and Bobulinski after leaving office. Despite these revelations and Joe Biden’s responsibility for Ukrainian policy during his tenure as vice president, he has repeatedly denied ever discussing business matters with his son. These denials strain credibility, especially when confronted with the wealth of evidence, including bank records, photographs, witnesses, and Joe Biden’s own statements.
It is crucial to note that none of this information constitutes mere rumor or conspiracy theories. The assertions made are extensively supported by tangible evidence. Unlike the final days of the 2020 election, when 51 former intelligence officers aligned with the Democrats attempted to undermine the credibility of the Hunter Biden controversy by labeling it as “Russian disinformation” or a “hoax,” the public is not buying into these excuses any longer. The congressional investigators will persist in their efforts to trace the money trail and should demand an end to Hunter Biden’s advantageous arrangement. However, it is equally vital that the President finally addresses these difficult questions. His refusal to do so would indicate a lack of satisfactory answers. Furthermore, if the media neglects to pose these inquiries, it would constitute journalistic negligence.
To initiate the process of seeking the truth, we offer a few pertinent questions for Joe Biden to answer. Bank records reveal that Hunter Biden not only paid himself using funds from foreign companies but also provided financial support to other family members, including his daughter-in-law and household bills in Delaware. How much of your family’s lifestyle was sustained by these payments from Hunter Biden? Can you unequivocally deny that you engaged in discussions with Tony Bobulinski regarding a potential business opportunity with a Chinese energy firm after your departure from office? You have consistently asserted that the Ukrainian prosecutor was dismissed due to corruption. So why did the Burisma executive claim that you did so as a favor to him? Mykola Zlochevsky asserts that he directly conversed with you on at least two occasions. What was the nature of these discussions? Given your emphasis on transparency within your administration, will you investigate the allegations raised by the two IRS whistleblowers?
Perhaps one of the most crucial questions, which Joe Biden has yet to face, is this: Suppose it is accurate that you derived no personal benefit from your son’s business ventures. Why did you permit him to exploit the Biden name on a global scale? Why did you not intervene and prevent him from assuming a position on the board of a Ukrainian gas company while you were concurrently handling matters concerning Ukraine as vice president?
Undeniably, the inquiry does not conclude here. However, the proverbial floodgates have been opened. Joe Biden and the Democrats can no longer dismiss this as a mere farce or confine the scrutiny solely to Hunter Biden, as the stench of impropriety permeates their entire family. The time has come for the “Big Guy” to address the nation.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
