Sadiq Khan’s Controversial Low Traffic Neighbourhoods: The Angry Outcry towards a Politician

Sadiq Khan’s Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTNs) schemes have been criticized as “dangerous” and disruptive to society, including parents and carers, by former UKIP London Assembly member David Kurten, now a member of the Heritage Party. Kurten believes that these traffic calming measures are one of the main concerns for Londoners. He asserts that the schemes are harming businesses and could potentially lead to fatalities.

Introduced by Mayor Khan in 2020 with £250million of Government funding, LTNs use barriers to restrict access to vehicles, creating pedestrian and cyclist-friendly spaces.

In an exclusive interview with Express.co.uk, Kurten states, “When I was campaigning in 2021, the LTNs were the primary issues raised by many constituents. The council’s implementation of these schemes severely hampers businesses, market traders, and tradesmen who now face difficulties in navigating the city. This has a direct impact on parents picking up their children or carers needing to reach their patients. Even ambulances struggle to pass through these obstructions. It’s a highly concerning matter that continues to be overlooked.”

POLL: Should Low Traffic Neighbourhoods be scrapped?

In an earlier statement, Mr. Khan highlighted evidence suggesting that areas with LTNs experience fewer accidents and deaths. He also mentioned a 10% reduction in street crime and increased physical activity among locals. However, opponents argue that the LTNs only displace congestion to other areas, and drivers have expressed frustration about the increased travel time caused by diversions.

Kurten, representing the majority opinion, maintains that most sensible people involved in productive activities oppose these schemes. He adds, “There are some individuals who prioritize climate concerns over practicality and use these schemes as a virtue signaling exercise. But in reality, there is increased congestion, longer journeys, higher emissions, and more pollution.”

Transport for London (TfL) counters these arguments by stating that research shows LTNs do not simply shift traffic from one place to another but contribute to an overall reduction in traffic volume. Helen Cansick, TfL’s Head of Healthy Streets Investment, emphasizes that LTNs were rapidly implemented during the pandemic to prioritize walking and cycling while allowing for social distancing. TfL continues to work with boroughs and emergency services to address localized congestion and access issues to ensure the success of LTNs and their positive impact on public health and air quality.

Reference

Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment