Daniel Penny’s recent interview on the Jordan Neely case has been making headlines nationwide. However, the media’s tendency to sensationalize and racialize everything seems to be the driving force behind the attention this case is receiving. It has all the makings of one of New York’s iconic cases, capturing the essence of America’s urban culture and society.
Despite the usual predictable reactions from individuals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Julia Salazar, who quickly labeled Neely’s death as a “murder” and “lynching,” respectively, it seems that the racial narrative surrounding this case has not gained much traction. This is surprising, given the circumstances. A closer examination of the facts, including the video evidence released so far, reveals that one of the individuals assisting Penny in restraining Neely is a person of color. Furthermore, there have been witnesses, including a woman who went to the local precinct to provide a statement in support of Penny and another Black woman who called him a “hero” in the press. These individuals may potentially testify in court.
This departure from the expected narrative can be seen in the comments section of The New York Times articles. Typically, readers’ comments align with the articles’ views, often expressing wholehearted agreement. However, in this case, many readers, including those who consider themselves left-leaning, do not support the idea of prosecuting Penny. This shift in perspective is likely due to the fact that those calling for Penny’s conviction do not actually ride the subway. Individuals like AOC, who claims to relate to the working class but seldom visits her district, and Comptroller Brad Lander, who relies on a city-funded driver, belong to the privileged class that can afford alternative modes of transportation. Those of us who rely on the subway, on the other hand, have a different perspective.
It’s almost as if we’re living in H.G. Wells’ “The Time Machine,” with the Uber Class representing the Above-Grounders and the Subway Class as the Under-Grounders. Recent headlines about subway-related incidents illustrate the challenges faced by subway commuters on a daily basis. These incidents occur frequently, leaving the working-class Morlocks to fend for themselves.
The defunding of the police, championed by the Uber Class, has created a void that individuals like Penny feel compelled to fill. The fact that someone like Neely, with a history of violent offenses, was able to walk away from an alternative incarceration sentence, should be a wake-up call to those who oppose law enforcement.
Undoubtedly, the image of Neely dying on the subway floor evokes sympathy. Despite his violent past, he was a human being in desperate need of help. The billions of dollars allocated to mental health initiatives and homeless services does not seem to be making a significant difference. It is a sad reality that cities like New York, under Democratic leadership, seem incapable of providing proper care and treatment to individuals like Neely.
The upcoming trial will center around whether Penny’s use of force was proportionate to the threat he faced. Penny claims that Neely threatened to kill him, which could potentially bolster his defense. It is my prediction that the jury will be deadlocked, but only time will tell. The Uberites will undoubtedly have a significant influence on the outcome, with their political motivations taking precedence over justice.
As we follow the Neely/Penny case, it becomes apparent that it is all about “votes” for the political elites orchestrating this narrative. They may have drivers chauffeuring them around, but they are watching closely, ready to exploit the situation for their own gain.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
