The Prosecution: Julius Fred’s Financial Insensitivity
Julius Fred, my older brother, seems to have a skewed understanding of money and doesn’t take into account the financial differences between us. This became evident during a recent altercation we had at a friend’s birthday dinner. Fred invited me to our mutual friend George’s birthday celebration. I agreed to go but mentioned that I had limited funds. Fred assured me that he would cover my portion if I was struggling. We ended up dining at a nice Korean restaurant, and I intentionally ordered only a starter and a drink because of my financial situation.
When the bill arrived, George suggested splitting it evenly among everyone. I looked at Fred, hoping he would remember his promise to cover my share. However, he feigned ignorance. I had to awkwardly remind everyone that I had only consumed a small amount of food. George kindly suggested that I pay less, but Fred called me annoying and accused me of eating some of the leftovers on the table. While that may have been true, I only did so after it was offered to me. I didn’t appreciate Fred publicly embarrassing me and denying his earlier agreement to cover my costs. It seems he enjoys teasing me in front of our friends, which I find neither amusing nor appropriate.
Fred earns a substantial income as a corporate lawyer, but he fails to acknowledge our differing financial situations. He often offers to lend me money, only to retract the offer later when his mood changes. I remember one instance when I needed a new laptop, and he initially agreed to lend me the money. However, he backed out, claiming I was broke, but then proceeded to plan a lavish trip to Ibiza. I ended up purchasing the laptop on finance because of his unreliable behavior. I joke about it, but it’s genuinely frustrating.
Another incident occurred when we went to Nando’s, and Fred forgot his card. I paid for our meal and requested that he transfer me his share as soon as he got home. He dismissed me, calling me “aggy” and implying that I was overreacting. However, he fails to realize that £20 means much more to me than it does to him. I texted him the next day, but he ignored my message. I decided not to pursue the matter further because I refuse to beg. When we went to the pub a month later, Fred bought me a pint as an apology, but I would have preferred he fulfill his financial obligation. He later claimed that he had simply forgotten to transfer the money due to his busy schedule, but he should have been more considerate.
At our respective ages of 27 and 30, I believe Fred should demonstrate more understanding towards those who do not share his financial status.
The Defense: Fred’s Pursuit of Fun over Financial Prudence
Julius is falsely painting me as a miser here. While it is true that I’ve offered to lend him money and then retracted that offer, there were valid reasons behind those decisions.
Regarding the meal, I found it irritating that Julius ended up consuming nearly as much as everyone else and then refused to split the bill equally or take responsibility for his own expenses. Before I invited him to George’s birthday, Julius had stated that he would only join for a drink, and I agreed to get him one. But somehow, he managed to order various items and help himself to others’ food. I felt he was trying to take advantage of me when he asked to pay for only what he consumed, even though he had eaten a considerable amount. That’s why I suggested splitting the bill with the other attendees. They are more my friends than his, so I admit that I was annoyed with the situation unfolding at the table.
As for the Nando’s incident, Julius is blowing it out of proportion. I genuinely forgot and missed his messages because of my busy work schedule. I later bought him a drink as a gesture of apology. Besides, I’ve helped him countless times in the past when he genuinely needed it. I understand that he is currently between work projects, but if he were truly struggling with rent or bills, I would ensure he was taken care of without any questions. However, I become stricter when I see him spending money unnecessarily or being selfish, such as at the birthday dinner.
The other time I reneged on lending Julius money was for a laptop. I withdrew the offer because he claimed to be broke but then proceeded to book a trip to Ibiza. It is unreasonable to ask for a significant loan and then indulge in an extravagant vacation.
Although we may come from different income brackets, Julius is not particularly adept at managing his finances. He prioritizes having a good time over making sensible financial choices. While I enjoy having fun as well, I am more cautious. Since we are close, I can tease him a bit about his decisions. But it’s about time he starts listening to me.
The Jury of Guardian Readers
Should Fred offer his brother more financial help?
If you offer to lend your brother money, you should follow through with it. By reneging on your promises, you erode trust and harm your relationship. You are his brother, not his parent.
Dani, 32
The only way to gain your brother’s trust is to fulfill your financial commitments. Paying people back promptly shouldn’t be difficult, Fred.
Benjamin, 26
Fred’s behavior towards his brother is mean-spirited and condescending, regardless of Julius’s financial decisions. Fred’s failure to pay his debts promptly is dishonorable, and he should rectify that.
Katrin, 43
Fred should have paid for Julius’s share at the birthday meal as agreed and addressed his concerns later. Calling out Julius publicly was unnecessary. Fred’s defense that Julius doesn’t make wise financial choices holds no weight.
Cal, 58
Now It’s Your Turn
In our online poll, share your opinion on whether Fred should continue lending money to his brother.
The poll will close on Thursday, September 14th, at 10 am BST.
Last Week’s Result
In our previous poll, we asked whether Imani should inform her sister that she can’t stay with her and her partner. 42% of respondents said yes, Imani is guilty, while 58% said no, Imani is innocent.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
