Barack Obama possessed a remarkable talent for delivering captivating speeches to large audiences, a skill that undoubtedly played a significant role in his political success. However, it was in a private conversation with a fellow Democrat that he uttered his most profound statement. Discussing Joe Biden as the party’s nominee in 2020, Obama famously warned, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f–k things up.” Looking at the evidence, it becomes clear that Obama was not mistaken in his assessment of his former vice president. From issues at the border to concerns regarding the economy and the surge in crime that has occurred under Biden’s watch, there is substantial proof that supports Obama’s claim.
Ukraine serves as a prime example of Obama’s point, albeit in a different way. It reveals that even when Biden manages to make the right decisions concerning significant policies, he still finds ways to “f–k things up.” This is evident in the peculiar timing of the president’s recent statements regarding Ukraine’s desire to join NATO, as well as his administration’s convoluted defense of their decision to provide cluster bombs to the Ukrainian military. Each misstep on critical details undermines the overall objective and potentially jeopardizes public support for an expensive foreign policy endeavor.
According to a German research firm, the United States has allocated a staggering $75 billion in aid to Ukraine as of May. This makes Ukraine the largest recipient of American foreign aid, a fact that raises concerns when considering the US government’s $1.5 trillion deficit.
Initially, Biden demonstrated an understanding of the necessity for NATO’s assistance in helping Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression. He recognized that the alliance’s primary purpose is to keep Russia out of Europe and viewed the invasion as a threat to global security. Despite the prevailing belief that Vladimir Putin’s tanks and army would conquer Ukraine swiftly and claim what they desired, Biden remained steadfast in his beliefs. This proved fortuitous as the Russian military proved far more incompetent and unprepared than anticipated. Additionally, NATO’s military and financial aid played an instrumental role in enabling Ukraine to hold its ground, with Biden playing a crucial role in coordinating these efforts.
However, since this impressive start, Biden’s inclination to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory has become a recurring pattern. His repeated refusals to provide upgraded weaponry to aid Ukraine, followed by belated approvals that resulted in unnecessary casualties and territorial losses, contradict the strategy of empowering Ukraine to repel Russia effectively. Biden’s indecisiveness regarding artillery, tanks, and fighter jets runs counter to the goal of equipping Ukraine with the necessary capabilities to fend off Putin’s forces.
Furthermore, despite the exorbitant cost of maintaining the status quo, Biden has shown no signs of concern regarding the effective use of funds or the potential for corruption. Over $30 billion has been allocated to broad categories of humanitarian aid and financial support, with little oversight to ensure that the money reaches its intended recipients. This means that American taxpayers are inadvertently supporting the corrupt practices of civil servants and sustaining the infrastructure of a notoriously corrupt country.
Biden’s most recent blunder occurred when he defended the decision to send cluster bombs to Ukraine, a weapon that most countries have banned. This ironic move occurred as the White House condemned Russia for utilizing the same weaponry against the Ukrainians. Cluster bombs release multiple small explosive devices over a wide area, with some failing to detonate immediately and posing a long-term threat to civilians. Biden’s explanation for this decision, claiming that Ukraine had run out of a certain explosive and the US was low on supply, was not only ill-advised but also revealed a failure in policy.
Earlier this year, historian Niall Ferguson expressed concerns about the detrimental impact of US aid to Ukraine on our own military stockpiles. He warned that our commitment to Ukraine was depleting our capacity to defend Taiwan in the event of Chinese aggression. Five months later, Biden publicly admits that the US is low on ammunition. If Ferguson could foresee this issue, it begs the question: why couldn’t the president?
In conclusion, these series of missteps and failures highlight that while Biden grasps the importance of certain policies, his ability to effectively execute and navigate the intricacies thereof remains questionable. Whether it’s his mishandling of crucial details or his failure to address concerns such as corruption and depleted resources, Biden’s actions consistently undermine the broader objectives and endanger public support for costly foreign policies.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
