According to The New York Times, judges are now being prohibited from having friends. The publication recently released a scathing article titled “Where Clarence Thomas Entered an Elite Circle and Opened a Door to the Court,” which is filled with 4,000 words of smears and insinuations. It’s no surprise that the left is attempting to undermine a justice who is black, conservative, and incredibly effective. The Democrats and their media allies are threatened by Clarence Thomas because he defies their expectations and doesn’t align with their agenda. The irony is that these individuals claim to champion diversity and equality, yet they attack and demonize someone who doesn’t conform to their ideology.
The Times tries to twist Thomas’ altruistic efforts of mentoring promising black students into something negative. They even criticize his involvement with the Horatio Alger Association, an organization that supports underprivileged students in pursuing higher education. It’s truly baffling how helping disadvantaged kids go to college can be portrayed as sinister. Thomas is an exemplary role model, and his story is an inspiration to many. However, the Times and the Democrats want to tarnish his reputation so that no other impoverished black child will aspire to follow in his footsteps. Their hatchet jobs are detestable and go against the principles of equality they claim to uphold.
Furthermore, the Times attempts to belittle Thomas’ modest financial circumstances and suggest that he has an unhealthy interest in material wealth. They highlight his friendships with individuals like billionaire David Sokol and focus on his visits to luxurious retreats and lavish parties. However, there is nothing inherently wrong with enjoying the company of friends or attending social events. The Times fails to uncover any evidence that shows Thomas’ friends have influenced his decisions or that they have had cases before the court. Instead, they latch onto these baseless accusations to further their agenda of undermining a conservative justice.
Meanwhile, Hunter Biden’s former psychiatrist, Dr. Keith Ablow, has become an artist and created an artwork for his former patient. Ablow’s artwork features a gigantic prescription form advising Hunter to “blow paint” instead of engaging in self-destructive behaviors. Hunter has taken up painting as a form of expression and has tried to sell his artworks for exorbitant prices. Ablow, while not specifically referring to Hunter, discusses the challenges of overcoming drug addiction and the inability to run away from emotional pain. Incriminating photos from Hunter’s abandoned laptop, such as him allegedly smoking crack while driving, prompt Ablow to reflect on the tragedies in Hunter’s life and the importance of productive outlets for pain.
Finally, the disparity in spending between the Special Counsel investigations into former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden is evident. Attorney Jack Smith, investigating Trump’s handling of classified documents, has spent $9.25 million so far, while Robert Hur, investigating Biden for the same issue, has only spent $1.2 million. This stark contrast raises questions about the motives and priorities behind these investigations.
In conclusion, The New York Times’ targeted character assassination of Clarence Thomas is a clear example of their agenda to undermine an institution they cannot control. Their attacks on Thomas are fueled by their disdain for a conservative black justice who defies their expectations. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden’s artistic pursuits and the differing spending in the Special Counsel investigations into Trump and Biden shed light on the complexities of politics and personal struggles.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
