Sources connected to the now-truncated HS2 project have shared stories of the immense difficulty, expense, and delays involved in constructing an underground electricity supply for a specific section of the line. The feasibility work costs skyrocketed from £3.5m to £12m as 18 potential solutions were explored for this seemingly simple task. Ultimately, the preferred option was deemed hazardous to canal bridges along the route. The next option was derailed when a landowner demanded £2.8m for crossing their property, leading HS2 to object. An independent valuer then raised the demand to £7m. The ultimately chosen option began construction earlier this year, three years behind schedule and at a much higher cost than initially intended.
It’s no surprise the overall project turned out to be expensive. The issue lies with the 2017 High Speed Rail Act, which places a significant burden of permissions and consents on contractors. This reflects the complexities involved in constructing a major railway through scenic and politically significant areas. Sunak’s decision to cancel the project was destructive, but it does make us consider whether our densely populated country, with its safeguarded natural beauty, is still the same place where grand railways were once constructed by pioneers like Brunel and Stephenson.
Perhaps it’s time to focus our efforts on designing a future that goes beyond massive engineering projects and instead prioritizes improving the quality of life for people in their local communities. Boring yet effective solutions such as buses, local trains, and reliable broadband could be more useful and less damaging to the environment.
Towering waste
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
