You can now listen to Fox News articles!
The federal indictment against Senator Robert Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey, on bribery charges is remarkable. While the senator enjoys the presumption of innocence, and an indictment only represents one side of the case, the level of detail and description of official acts taken by Menendez in the indictment will pose challenges for his defense, both legally and politically.
Sen. Menendez may have been able to successfully defend himself in the past, but it appears that his luck may be running out. The indictment paints a picture of traditional, corruption-ridden politics. The involvement of cash, totaling nearly $500,000, a new Mercedes-Benz convertible, a no-show job, and the discovery of $150,000 worth of real gold bars at his house during an FBI search in June 2022, gives a clear implication of misconduct. It’s almost as if they were searching for a Tommy Gun to complete the scene.
MENENDEZ DEFIANT AS GROWING CHORUS OF DEMOCRATS CALL FOR HIS RESIGNATION
More significant than the material possessions is the questionable path by which Sen. Menendez and his wife, Nadine, obtained them. Nadine Menendez’s pre-existing friendship with Will Hana, a New Jersey businessman with connections to Egyptian officials, played a role in this story. Hana, along with his associates Jose Uribe and Fred Daibes, are co-defendants along with the Menendezes.
The involvement of these individuals is evident from the onset. The indictment describes various official actions taken by Menendez starting in March 2018, as well as valuable items given to him and Nadine around the same time, creating a strong suggestion of a quid pro quo. Text messages exchanged between Nadine Menendez and Hana, Uribe, and Daibes, along with the presence of fingerprints or DNA on cash envelopes found in the Menendezes’ home, a Google search by Sen. Menendez for “kilo of gold price,” and Hana’s purchase of gold bars after meeting with the senator and an Egyptian official, suggest a tight connection to the bribery allegations.
DEMOCRATIC SEN. BOB MENENDEZ FACING INDICTMENT ON BRIBERY CHARGES
In recent years, bribery cases have become increasingly challenging for the government to prosecute. The Supreme Court’s ruling in the case against former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell narrowed the definition of “official acts” necessary for a bribery conviction. The Court clarified that merely arranging meetings, making phone calls, or hosting events does not, in itself, constitute an “official act.”
Furthermore, in the context of honest services fraud, the Court determined that an “official act” requires a public official to make a decision or take action on a specific matter. It should be noted that Menendez’s actions, if proven, go beyond the threshold set by the McDonnell case. They represent classic and extreme examples of how a senator might abuse their position for personal gain, including:
- Misusing his role as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to release military aid to Egypt in exchange for a low or no-show job for Nadine
- Interfering with the Department of Agriculture to benefit Hana’s company and resolve Nadine’s mortgage issues
- Attempting to influence a criminal investigation into Uribe’s companies in exchange for a new Mercedes-Benz convertible
- Seeking to manipulate an ongoing prosecution of Daibes in exchange for cash and gold bars
These actions strike at the core of Menendez’s responsibilities as a senator and represent a grave betrayal of his oath.
NEW JERSEY GOV. PHIL MURPHY CALLS ON SEN. MENENDEZ TO RESIGN FOLLOWING INDICTMENT
Interfering with criminal investigations and manipulating foreign aid have far-reaching implications for elected officials. Menendez cannot convincingly assert that these official actions were merely constituent services.
This is not the first time Menendez has faced corruption charges. In a previous case in 2015, he was accused of accepting lavish gifts and campaign contributions from a Florida ophthalmologist, Salomon Melgen, who had a billing dispute with Medicare. Menendez allegedly used his staff to advocate for Melgen, among other favors. However, that case ended in a mistrial as Menendez argued that his actions were simply friends helping friends.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
This current case presents significant differences. Menendez does not have a long-standing friendship with Hana and his associates, the official actions involved are more substantial, and the items received are more scandalous compared to the previous gifts he received from Melgen.
In conclusion, it will be challenging for Menendez to resort to his previous defense strategies this time.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM SCOTT A. COFFINA
Scott A. Coffina is a former Assistant United States Attorney, State Prosecutor, Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush, and Senior Deputy Chief Counsel to Governor Chris Christie. He is currently in private practice at Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP.
Denial of responsibility! Vigour Times is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
