Introducing the new feature on Fox News – you can now listen to articles! The recent appointment of David Weiss as special counsel in the Hunter Biden investigation has sparked objections from various individuals, including those who have long called for such an appointment. However, Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to select someone from within the Justice Department, rather than an external candidate as required by law, has raised concerns. Moreover, whistleblowers have accused Weiss of conducting a biased investigation. Nonetheless, the most significant issue lies in Garland’s failure to extend the investigation’s scope to encompass the growing corruption scandal involving President Joe Biden. It seems unlikely that Garland will explore corruption allegations related to the $20 million transferred from various foreign entities, some of which have ties to foreign intelligence. The media, too, has turned a blind eye to these developments and refuses to report on the scandal unless there is concrete evidence of Joe Biden accepting money. They refuse to conduct independent investigations or acknowledge the mounting evidence of a sophisticated system of financial transactions designed to conceal these illicit payments.
Who is David Weiss? Hunter Biden’s appointed prosecutor in the special counsel investigation.
Despite Joe Biden’s repeated denials of awareness regarding his son’s foreign business deals, the media now has to accept that Hunter was indeed selling influence and access. However, they demand direct deposits to Joe Biden as proof, conveniently ignoring the fact that the purpose of the complex financial system was to avoid such direct transactions. It is akin to an “impossible task” demand, reminiscent of Slavic folklore where a suitor is tasked with finding something he doesn’t know where and getting something he doesn’t know what. While a direct bribe or deposit to Joe Biden is not impossible, it would violate the unwritten rules of professional influence peddlers. The Bidens, who have been involved in this business for years, are well aware of this, with Hunter even referring to themselves as the best at delivering what foreign figures desire. One would be a fool to deposit any of the $20 million directly into Joe or Jill Biden’s actual bank accounts, as these are closely monitored and subject to potential legal action. Instead, congressional investigations have uncovered numerous shell companies and accounts that the Bidens have used to hide the transfer of millions to family members, including grandchildren. Joe Biden’s wealth, coupled with his age of 80, suggests that he is more interested in passing wealth down to his descendants rather than accumulating it personally.
These transactions also involved deliverables. Recently, Devon Archer confirmed that Hunter’s Ukrainian clients sought the Bidens’ assistance in removing Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, with Biden subsequently conditioning U.S. aid on Shokin’s firing. Despite years of denying any evidence of influence peddling or contradictions regarding the president, the media now demands a virtual confession or evidence of direct payments to Joe Biden himself. When faced with such evidence and denials from the president, the media appears exasperated, resorting to the “illusion of influence” argument, urging the public not to assume that the influence sold actually materialized. In this final demand, the media relies on the Bidens’ ability to conceal payments and avoid any incriminating deposits. Biden himself has mockingly asked, “Where’s the money?” when questioned about his numerous calls with Hunter and his business partners. While the media largely disregards the absurdity of conducting “business” on a speakerphone in a public setting, the purpose of these calls was to establish Hunter’s credentials as an influencer and to validate his access to his father.
The Bidens have perfected the art of corruption, as Uncle Earl Long once said: “Don’t write anything you can phone, don’t phone anything you can talk, don’t talk anything you can whisper, don’t whisper anything you can smile, don’t smile anything you can nod, and don’t nod anything you can wink.” The true illusion here is that the Bidens have managed to make this scandal disappear in front of the public’s eyes. As I previously wrote, the trick to their illusion was getting the media to buy into the deception, much like audience members who are called on stage during a magic show. Reporters are now forced to either support the illusion or admit their complicity in the deception. Despite the millions funneled to the Biden family and acknowledgments that they were capitalizing on the Biden brand, it seems that the media’s demands cannot be satisfied. Even with a complex network of shell companies and accounts specifically designed for obfuscation, the media demands that the Bidens simply make direct payments to Joe and Jill Biden, akin to a Venmo transfer. While not impossible, it is highly improbable, mirroring Merrick Garland’s unlikely appointment of an independent counsel to thoroughly investigate the Biden corruption scandal.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
