When the wildfire smoke from outside began to cover New York City in June, the employees at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (S.O.M.), an architecture and design firm, had a front-row seat to the unfolding crisis. From their high-rise office, they witnessed the sky turn from hazy blue to gray, and eventually to an otherworldly orange. However, inside the office, the air was cool and clean, thanks to indoor air-quality sensors that were installed during the pandemic.
Indoor air-quality sensors have become increasingly popular in the design and engineering industry, as they provide real-time data on pollutants and allow for optimization of energy use. The pandemic has heightened interest in these sensors, as clients seek to monitor air quality and create a safe environment for their tenants and employees.
Despite the growing interest in indoor air-quality sensors, there are still challenges to overcome. The lack of regulation and the aging infrastructure in the United States pose obstacles to improving indoor air quality. Additionally, the long-term sustainability of the technology remains uncertain, as interest may wane now that the emergency phase of the pandemic is over.
S.O.M., a firm that prioritizes health and safety, had already begun researching sensors before the pandemic hit. When they designed their own office space, they installed a system to monitor particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and carbon dioxide levels. This system not only helped mitigate the risk of viral transmission during the pandemic but also provided long-term benefits, such as improved air quality and potential energy savings.
The sensors are linked to the ventilation system, allowing for real-time adjustments based on air quality readings. This not only ensures a safe and comfortable environment but also reduces energy consumption by delivering fresh air only when necessary.
While the sensors have proven effective in monitoring air quality during the wildfire crisis, there are still limitations to consider. Carbon dioxide sensors, for example, provide a rough estimate of infection risk but do not directly measure airborne pathogens. Furthermore, the implementation of sensors in more buildings may face challenges due to varying interests among employers, workers, and building owners.
Overall, the use of indoor air-quality sensors has been a step forward in addressing the invisible problem of poor indoor air quality. Despite the challenges, these sensors have the potential to improve health and well-being, reduce energy costs, and create a safer indoor environment for all.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
