Medical malpractice refers to situations where a physician or surgeon fails to provide the expected level of care and skill that is typically practiced by professionals in similar circumstances. This is a form of negligence that occurs when healthcare providers do not meet the established standards of the medical field. To prove a malpractice claim, it must be shown that the healthcare provider either failed to do what a reasonably prudent professional would have done, or did something that a reasonably prudent professional would not have done, thus causing harm to the patient.
There are certain elements that need to be established to prove medical negligence. First, there must be a duty owed by the physician to the patient to act in accordance with the specific norms and standards of the medical profession. Second, there must be a breach of this duty. Third, there must be a reasonably close connection between the negligent act or omission and the resulting injury. Finally, the patient must have suffered damages as a result of the negligence.
Establishing the physician-patient relationship is usually straightforward. However, proving negligence or deviation from standard medical procedures often requires expert testimony from other doctors who are specialists in the relevant field. Unfortunately, obtaining expert testimonies can be difficult as many doctors are hesitant to testify against their colleagues. An exception to the requirement of expert testimony is the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, which translates to “the thing speaks for itself.” This exception allows for a presumption of negligence based on certain types of occurrences and injuries, in the absence of any other explanation.
An example of how res ipsa loquitur applied in a medical malpractice case is the case of Erlinda Ramos. Erlinda underwent a cholecystectomy, but the surgery was marred by delays, difficulties in intubation, and a decrease in blood supply to her brain. As a result, she suffered brain damage and remained in a comatose condition. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the patient, finding that the doctors and hospital were negligent and their actions were the proximate cause of Erlinda’s condition. Despite not having an expert witness, the Court held that there was clear evidence of negligence and malpractice.
It is important to note that the application of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable to all cases of medical negligence. It does not automatically shift the burden of proof to the defendant to disprove negligence. Additionally, it does not apply to cases involving the merits of a diagnosis or scientific treatment. Physicians and surgeons are not required to explain why a particular diagnosis was not correct or why a specific treatment did not produce the desired result.
In conclusion, medical malpractice occurs when healthcare providers fail to meet the expected standards of care and skill in their profession. Proving medical negligence requires establishing duty, breach, causation, and damages. Expert testimony is typically required, although the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur can be applied in certain cases. It is important to recognize the limitations of this doctrine and its applicability in medical malpractice cases.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
