Robert Card, the gunman responsible for the recent massacre in Lewiston, Maine, has raised concerns about the effectiveness of law enforcement in preventing such a tragedy. Card, an Army reservist, killed 18 people and injured 13 others at a bowling alley and bar before taking his own life.

Questionable Response from Law Enforcement

As the investigation into the shooting continues, law enforcement is facing criticism for their handling of Card’s case. It has come to light that Card had undergone psychiatric treatment in July and had exhibited erratic behavior that raised concerns among co-workers. Additionally, deputies had attempted to contact him in mid-September but were unsuccessful.

Warnings Signs Ignored

Several individuals, including Card’s former co-workers and family members, noticed significant changes in his mental state prior to the shooting. Co-workers reported that Card became increasingly aggressive and spoke frequently and aggressively about guns. One co-worker even expressed concerns that Card may eventually commit an act of violence. Despite these warning signs, no action was taken to prevent him from accessing firearms.

Missed Opportunities

Records indicate that Card’s mental health had been a concern as early as May, when deputies in Sagadahoc County contacted his family due to worries about his mental state. Card’s family also reached out to law enforcement and his Army Reserve base expressing their concerns. Card was even sent for psychiatric treatment, but no further action was taken, and his guns were not confiscated. This has raised questions about the adequacy of Maine’s gun laws and the lack of red flag laws to address situations like Card’s.

The Need for Gun Control and Mental Health Measures

This tragic incident has highlighted the need for stricter gun control laws, especially in cases where individuals exhibit clear signs of mental instability or a likelihood of committing harm. Maine’s current laws only allow law enforcement to petition a judge to restrict an individual’s access to guns after a medical evaluation has been conducted. This process is clearly insufficient in preventing potential acts of violence.

Overall, the case of Robert Card serves as a reminder of the urgency to address both gun control and mental health concerns in order to prevent future tragedies.