In 1988, a 65-year-old man experienced cardiac arrest at his home. Due to a lack of CPR knowledge, his wife and son resorted to using a toilet plunger in an attempt to revive him until medical help arrived. Following his recovery at San Francisco General Hospital, the man’s son suggested placing toilet plungers next to all beds in the coronary unit. Although the hospital did not implement this idea, it sparked the doctors’ interest in improving CPR techniques. Now, over three decades later, researchers presented data at a medical conference showing that a plunger-like device can significantly increase the chances of successfully reviving patients.
Traditional CPR has a less than satisfactory success rate, with only 7 percent of individuals who receive it before reaching the hospital being discharged with full brain function, according to a national registry of cardiac arrests. Dr. Keith Lurie, the cardiologist who treated the initial plunger patient, describes these statistics as “dismal.” However, a new method called neuroprotective CPR offers hope for better outcomes. This innovative procedure consists of three components: a silicone plunger that facilitates chest compressions, a plastic valve to regulate lung pressure, and a body-positioning device that optimizes blood flow to the brain.
Researchers have studied the combined use of these devices and have reported promising results. Dr. Paul Pepe, a CPR researcher, shared data from a study involving 380 patients who could not be revived using defibrillation alone. The study revealed that those who received neuroprotective CPR within 11 minutes of cardiac arrest had a 6.1 percent survival rate with intact brain function, compared to just 0.6 percent with traditional CPR.
Furthermore, a study conducted in four states demonstrated similar findings. Patients who received neuroprotective CPR within 11 minutes of a 911 call were three times more likely to survive with good brain function compared to those who received conventional CPR. These positive outcomes have led experts to consider neuroprotective CPR as a more effective approach.
One of the survivors, Jason Benjamin, shared his experience of suffering cardiac arrest and being revived using neuroprotective CPR. After his recovery, Mr. Benjamin extensively researched the procedure and even coined the term “neuroprotective CPR.” He believes this term accurately reflects the procedure’s focus on protecting the brain.
While the new approach has garnered interest and physiological support, more research is needed before it can be officially recommended as a treatment option. Dr. Karen Hirsch, a neurologist at Stanford University, emphasizes the importance of additional patient studies and clinical trials for validation.
Meanwhile, Dr. Joe Holley, the medical director for an emergency medical service in Memphis, has already implemented neuroprotective CPR in his teams’ protocols. He reports remarkable improvements in neurologically intact survival rates, from 7 percent with conventional CPR to around 23 percent with the new approach. Dr. Holley’s crews have also noticed an increase in positive outcomes and grateful patients who visit fire stations to express their gratitude.
In conclusion, the use of a plunger-like device in CPR has shown promising results, offering a potential breakthrough in improving survival rates and brain function. While further research is necessary for widespread adoption, early data suggests that neuroprotective CPR holds significant promise in revolutionizing emergency medical procedures and outcomes.
Denial of responsibility! VigourTimes is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
